The new wave in education is a far cry from the traditional way where textbooks reigned and curriculum was designed for a one size fits all student body. Universal Design for Learning ("UDL") is all about embracing diversity in learners. UDL has three principles. First, teachers need to be flexible with how they represent and introduce the content. Second, teachers must provide multiple ways for students to express themselves in the curriculum. Third, teachers must be aware and accomodate for the individualize ways students are engaged. By adapting the principles of UDL, teachers are flexible with their curriculum so that students excel at learning and are intrinsically motivated.
For my CEP 811 class, I need to answer the following questions relating to Universal Design for Learning:
Q: At the core of UDL is the premise that often the curriculum is disabled (and disabling!). It is not flexible; it often poses barriers, and consequently prevents rather than supports optimal learning experiences. Do you agree or disagree with this view? Why or why not?
A: I disagree with the view that curriculum is disabled and poses barriers which interfere with learning. Without curriculum, teachers would be recess aids. Curriculum provides us with a framework, a set of goals to reach. Teachers are artists and shape the curriculum to meet the needs of the diverse student body. Curriculum is not the problem. The responsibility is on the school district and its teachers to create a rigorous curriculum that engages students and accommodates the diverse group of learners present in every classroom.
Q: What are the benefits of analyzing the curriculum for strengths and weaknesses rather than focusing on the student’s strengths and weaknesses? What are the challenges of this approach?
A: Spending time analyzing curriculum is a good thing; students will benefit when curriculum has the kinks ironed out. We as educators can never put enough time into planning, strategizing, and reevaluating what and how we teach students. However, if all the attention is put into analyzing the curriculum, the students' strengths and weaknesses become the background. As educators, our ultimate goal is to bring up responsible citizens who will participate and foster growth in our communities. Students are our primary focus, and spending too much time analyzing curriculum can take the attention off what truly matters.
Next, I will analyze one of my lesson plans using the UDL Guidelines. (See below.)
UDL Guidelines – Educator Checklist
|
|
Your notes
|
|
Feature:
Real life visual of content, image
|
|
Barrier:
Students only hearing teacher’s voice
|
|
Feature:
Content is deliever in text, real life examples (touch)
|
|
Feature:
touch, text, and
|
|
Feature:
teacher and peer feedback
|
|
Feature:
French lesson
|
|
Feature:
hands on
|
|
Feature:
activates bk
|
|
Feature:
relates content to personal needs
|
|
Barrier:
No scaffolding provided
|
|
Feature:
Student associate content to real life tasks (grocery errands and diet)
|
|
Your notes
|
|
Feature: Online technologies, Peer
group, Art, Touch, Smell, Sight, Speech, Auditory
|
|
Feature: blind fold activity
|
|
Barrier: None provided
|
|
Feature: Twitter discussion
|
|
Feature: Books in native language
|
|
Feature: Creation of grocery list
using content
Barrier: No scaffold for practice
in peer groups
|
|
Feature: Real life task assessment
Feature: Prompts healthy dietary
thinking and choices
|
|
Your notes
|
|
Feature:
text, aural, oral, sight
|
|
Feature:
relevant content to real life
|
|
Barrier:
content promotes sharing likes/dislikes and some students may not feel
comfortable liking something without knowing how peers will react
|
|
Feature:
Long term goals implemented with content covered
|
|
Feature:
Simple to more advanced content and technology (access to and use of Twitter)
|
|
Feature:
peer groups, class discussions
|
|
Feature: Student Blog post, group discussion
|
|
Feature: Student blog
|
|
© CAST 2009
After analyzing my lesson plan, I found some areas where I can adapt the lesson to meet the individualized needs of my students. I found that I did not take into account any Assistive Technologies, nor did I consider the dynamics of an autistic student. This lesson would work well for a student with ADHD because there is lots of new content and it is very fast paced. However, it does not follow a normal class routine, and perhaps a student who struggles with change would be challenged at the pace and introduction of all the new content. This lesson was created outside of a classroom setting, as I am not currently teaching. I imagine that if I created this lesson for a specific set of learners, I would greatly change the order and amount of tasks I do. I would also adapt the methods and technologies used to meet my learners.
This experience has shown me that regardless of having a predetermined lesson, I would ultimately gear and tweak the lesson to fit the diverse make-up of students in my class. My curriculum is just the base from where I uniquely design the ladder my students will climb.
No comments:
Post a Comment